STUDY OF TRUST CATEGORY IN INTERDISCIPLINARY APPROACH
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18524/2304-1609.2018.1(47).139768Keywords:
trust, mistrust, phenomenon, nature of trust, structure of trust, function of trust, concept of trustAbstract
Trust is the fundamental category in philosophy, sociology, economy, phycology and jurisprudence.
In philosophy ethic trust is determined as moral attitudes and situated in possibility of prognoses of behavior of the person which is grounded on the knowledge about it and coincides with interests and understanding of moral. In philosophy ideas there are trace of positive understanding about trust, mistrust studied as phenomenon which is in the opposite to trust and closely interacts with him in the same continuum. In philosophy minds trust has its own structure and synthesize it in rational, irrational and spiritual — ethic components in the view of trust expectations and has direction to the realization of activities for achievement of maximum effective result. Together with this it appears as protrude of formation of subject relations on the basis of values as spiritual reference points.
In economical contest trust is determined as social economical phenomenon of consciousness and functional characteristic of social life of society.
Sociologists made serious contribution in formation of science knowledge about phenomenon of «trust — mistrust», emphasize importance of role of trust for stable functioning and development of modern society. In investigations of western and domestic scientists outweighs positive points of view for the phenomenon of trust. Authors gives determination of studied phenomenon, distinguish its structure, variety, stages of formation, development and describe trust as the mechanism which is stabilize of expectation in conditions of complication and transformation of society.
In political science determination of trust acquires ontological meanings. From the point of view of political scientist the main function of trust is durability of state and its authorities.
In the shown directions of classical foreign phycology trust is tightly connected with physiological health of person. Trust to own self linked with autonomy of person and trust to the other with skills to be open to yourself, to your own knowledge and surrounding. In domestic psychology trust appears not as phenomenon but as scientific concept.
In this way, theoretical analysis of scientific psychological literature showed the complication of concept of trust and existence of many variations of its interpretation in different branches of socio — humanitarian sciences. There is principal difference in approaches of study of this phenomenon in foreign and domestic literature. Significant differences in interpretation and aspects of studies of trust are marked in some branches of psychological science. Perspectives of further investigation of the problem are seen in actualization of theoretical material to the practical area in studies of patterns of formation of mechanisms of trust and mistrust in different live situations.
References
Antonenko, I. V.(2006). Sotsialnaya psihologiya doveriya [Social psychology of trust]. Yaroslavl [in Russian].
Bolnov, O. F. (1999) Filosofiya ekzistentsializma [The philosophy of existentialism]. SPb.: Izdatelstvo «Lan» [in Russian].
Buber M. (1995). Dva obraza veryi [Two ways of faith]. M.: Respublika [in Russian].
Vershinin, S. E. (2001) The phenomenon of mistrust in the context of the post-Soviet society: the formulation of the problem. Nauchnyiy ezhegodnik Instituta filosofii i prava Uralskogo otdeleniya Rossiyskoy Akademii nauk. In-t filosofii i prava Ural. otdeleniya RAN (Vol. 2.). Ekaterinburg. [in Russian].
Glushko, I. V. (2014). Methodological foundations and categorical-paradigmatic schematic construction of the analysis of the social phenomenon of trust. Historical, philosophical, political and legal sciences, culturology and art history. Questions of theory and practice.(iss.9). [in Russian].
Gobbs, T. (1991). Sochineniya. [Compositions]. (Vols. 1–2; Vol. 2). M.: Myisl. [in Russian].
Istoriya filosofii: Zapad-Rossiya-Vostok (kniga vtoraya. Filosofiya XV-XIX vv.) (2012) [West-Russia-East (book two, Philosophy of VX-XX centuries)]. V. M. Boguslavskiy, M. N. Gromov, T. B. Dlugach, V. A. Zhuchkov, N. V. Motroshilova, V. V. Sokolov, E. Yu. Solovev, A. B. Ballaev. N. V. Motroshilovoy (Ed). M.: Akademicheskiy proekt. [in Russian].
Kapterev P. F. Izbrannyie pedagogicheskie sochineniya (1982). [Selected pedagogical compositions]. A. M. Arseneva (Ed). P. A. Lebedev (works). Akad. ped. nauk SSSR. M.: Pedagogika. [in Russian].
Kozhem’yakIna O. (2011). Valuable semantic principles of the philosophy of trust. Bulletin of the Chernigiv National Pedagogical University named after. T. G. Shevchenko (iss.95) Third All-Ukrainian Kulyshev Readings on Philosophy, Ethnoculture, dedicated to the memory of SB Krymsky. V. A. Lichkovaha (Ed). Chernsgsv : ChNPU. [In Ukrainian].
Kondrashova-Didenko V. I., L. V. Didenko. (2010) Trust: the polyvariance of meanings. Theoretical and applied questions of the economy (iss.22). [In Ukrainian].
Kokuev A. A. (2003) Osobennosti doveriya k sebe i drugim u nesovershennoletnih prestupnikov, ot byivayuschih nakazanie v vide lisheniya svobodyi [Features of trust in themselves and others in juvenile offenders serving a sentence of imprisonment]. Rostov n/D. [in Russian].
Kochyunas R. (2000). Psihoterapevticheskie gruppyi, teoriya i praktika. [Psychotherapeutic groups, theory and practice.] M.: Akademicheskiy proekt. [in Russian].
Kuprejchenko, A. B., S. P. Tabharova (2007). Criteria of trust and distrust of the person to other people. Psychological journal (iss 2.)
Lokk, Dzh. (1988). Dva traktata o gosudarstvennom pravlenii. Sochineniya. [Two treatises on public administration. Compositions] (Vols. 1–3; Vol.3).M.: Mysl’. [in Russian].
Makiavelli, N. (1990). Gosudar’ [Prince] M.: Planeta. [in Russian].
Mіshchenko A. (2010). Dovіra yak skladova legіtimacії vladi v umovah suchasnoї demokratії [Trust as a component of the legitimization of power in a modern democracy] Kiev. [In Ukrainian].
Panorama of economic thought of the late XX century. (2002). D. Grinuehya, M. Blini, I. Styuarta (Ed). (Lipinsksy D. G., Rozmainsksy I. V., Skorobogatov A. S., Trans). (Vols. 1–2; Vol.1).M.: Ehkonomicheskaya shkola.
Perlz F. (1995). Vnutri i vne pomijnogo vedra. Praktikum po geshtal’tterapii. [Inside and outside the pown bucket. Inside and outside of the bucket bucket, a Gestalt therapy workshop]. SPb.
Psychology of Communication and Confidence: Theory and Practice: Proceedings of the International Conference URAO, PI RAO, Moscow State University. (2014). T. P. Skripkina (Ed). — M.: Universitet RAO. [in Russian].
Rodzhers K. (2001). Vchitisya buti vіl’nim [Learn to be free] (Vols. 1–3; Vol.1). (R. Tkach, G. Bal, Trans). K.: Unіversitets’ke vid-vo «Pul’sari».
Romashkіn G. S. (2011). Doverie v rossijskom obshchestveehkonomiko-sociologicheskij analiz.[Trust in Russian society; economic and sociological]. Tyumen’. [in Russian].
Russo, ZH. ZH. (1981). «Ehmil’ ili o vospitanii»: hrestomatiya po istorii zarubezhnoj pedagogiki [«Emil or the upbringing»: chronicle on the history of foreign pedagogy]. (Piskunov A. I., Trans). M.
Skripkina T. P. (2000). Psihologiya doveriya. [Psychology of trust]. M.: Izdatel’skij centr «Akademiya». [in Russian].
Stolyar V. YU. (2008). Social’no-filosofskij i mezhdisciplinarnyj diskurs o doverii. [Sociophilosophical and interdisciplinary discourse on trust]. Izvestiya of the Russian State Pedagogical University named after. AI Herzen — No. 36 (77). Postgraduate notebooks: scientific jour. (iss.36) SPb.
Frankl V. (1995) Chelovek v posikah smіsla [A man searching for meaning]. M. Progress.
Fukuyama F.(2008). Doverie: social’nye dobrodeteli i put’ k procvetaniyu. [Trust: social virtues and the path to prosperity]. M.: AST; AST MOSKVA.
H’ell L. (2001). Teorii lichnosti. [Theories of personality]. Spb.: Piter.
Chiker V. A., Gorbashkova YU. S. (2013). Organizacionnoe doverie v malom biznese i psihologicheskoe zdorov’e personala. [Organizational Trust in Small Business and Psychological Health of Personnel] Ananev Readings-2013. Psychology in Public Health: Materials of a Scientific Conference. SPb.: Skifiya-print.
Shtompka, P. (2002). Doverie: sociologicheskaya teoriya. [Trust: sociological theory]. Sociological review. (Vols. 1–2; Vol.2. iss.3). M: Institute of Sociology, Russian Academy of Sciences.
Ehkonomika i sociologiya doveriya. (2004). [Economics and sociology of trust]. Y U. V. Veselov (Ed). SPb.: Sociologicheskoe obshchestvo im. M. M. Kovalevskogo. [in Russian].
Ehrikson EH. (1996). Detstvo i obshchestvo.[Childhood and society]. SPb.: Lenato, AST, Fond«Universitetskaya kniga».
Yum D. (1748). Issledovanie o chelovecheskom razumenii [The study of human understanding].
Jones К. Trust as an Aff ective Attitude // Ethics. 1996. N 107. P. 4–25.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Правовласниками опублікованого матеріалу являються авторський колектив та засновник журналу на умовах, що визначаються видавничою угодою, що укладається між редакційною колегією та авторами публікацій. Ніяка частина опублікованого матеріалу не може бути відтворена без попереднього повідомлення та дозволу автора.
Публікація праць в Журналі здійснюється на некомерційній основі.
Після публікації автор має право опублікувати свою роботу в будь-якому іншому засобі масової інформації без дозволу редакції журналу, без посилання на журнал, але з повідомленням редакційної колегії журналу про публікацію своєї роботи в іншому засобі масової інформації.
Редакція має право віддати роботу автора на публікацію до іншого засобу масової інформації, але з дозволу автору.
Положення про конфіденційність
Імена та електронні адреси, які вказуються користувачами сайту цього журналу, будуть використовуватись виключно для виконання внутрішніх технічних завдань цього журналу; вони не будуть поширюватись та передаватись стороннім особам.
