PSYCHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF PERSONALITY THE LATE MATURITY

Authors

  • О. І. Кононенко Odessa I. I. Mechnikov National University, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18524/2304-1609.2014.4%20(34).135248

Keywords:

personality, identity, self-identity crisis in the aged, personal maturity

Abstract

The article deals with the problem of identity and transformation features all the specific construct identity crisis under the influence of late maturity. The article deals with the peculiarities of the late maturity. It is noted that late maturity is one of the most productive periods in human creativity, integration expertise. The main purpose of the article is theoretical analysis of the psychological characteristics of the individual in the late maturity. Maturity is the most prolonged and significant period of ontogeny, characterized by a tendency to achieve the highest of spiritual, intellectual faculties of man, or as they say is from the standpoint acmeological approach — acme. Modern scholars of our day for primary tumors in this age believe — achieve personal maturity, defined, subjectivity, internality of personality at exploring the inner world, obtaining access to spirituality. Personal maturity — a kind of psychological result of self-experienced man in adulthood identity crisis, characterized as psychological growths mature period of human life and is a dynamic personality structure important for identity forming such important features as responsibility, depth of experience, tolerance, autonomy, contact, self-acceptance, creativity, etc. That personal maturity in crisis provides a person a choice of moral values as priorities in life.

Author Biography

О. І. Кононенко, Odessa I. I. Mechnikov National University

Kononenko O.I.

References

Anan’ev B. G. O problemah sovremennogo chelovekoznanija / B. G. Anan’ev. — SPb.: Piter, 2001. — 263 s. — (Pershotvіr).

Ancyferova L. I. K psihologii lichnosti kak razvivajushhejsja sistemy // Psihologija formirovanija i razvitija lichnosti / L. I. Anciferova. — M.: Nauka, 1981. — S. 3–19.

Beh I. D. O pokazatele nravstvennogo razvitija lichnosti / I. D. Beh // Zb. tekstіv vistupіv na Mіzhnarodnih naukovih Kostjukіvs’kih chitannjah. T. 1. — K., 1992. — S. 11–12.

Golovaha E. I. Zhiznennaja perspektiva i cennostnye orientacii lichnosti /E. I. Golovaha // Psihologija lichnosti v trudah otechestvennyh psihologov. — SPb.: Piter, 2000. — S. 256–269.

Grigor’ev S. I. Zhiznennye sily cheloveka / Grigor’ev S. I., Demina L. D., Rastov Ju. E. — K.: Naukova dumka, 2000. — 342 s.

Lishin O. V. A. G. Maslou i kul’turno-istoricheskaja koncepcija lichnostnogo razvitija / O. V. Lishin // Mir psihologii. — 1999. — № 4(20). — S. 295–302.

Maksimenko S. D. Rozvitok psihіki v ontogenezі / S. D. Maksimenko: [v 2 t.]. — K.: Forum, 2002. — T. 1: Teoretiko-metodologіchnі problemi genetichnoї psihologії. — 319 s.

Stepanov S. Ju. Refleksivnaja praktika tvorcheskogo razvitija cheloveka i organizacij / S. Ju. Stepanov. — M.: Nauka, 2000. — 243 s.

Tatenko V. A. Problema rozvitku sub’ektivnih mehanіzmіv psihіchnoї aktivnostі v ontogenezі / V. A. Tatenko // Zb. tekstіv vistupіv na Mіzhnarodnih naukovih Kostjukіvs’kih chitannjah. T. 1. — K., 1992. — S. 76–77.

Jamnic’kij V. M. Zhittetvorchі risi osobistostі / V. M. Jamnic’kij // Nauka і osvіta. — 2006. — № 5–6. — S. 116–118.

Published

2015-12-26

Issue

Section

Статті