THEORETICAL AND METHODOLOGICAL BASIS OF RESEARCH IMMATURITY

Authors

  • Ю. В. Форманюк South Ukrainian National Pedagogical University K. D. Ushinsky, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18524/2304-1609.2014.3(33).135243

Keywords:

infantile, infantilism, personality, genetic-modeling approach, way of life of the individual

Abstract

Socio-economic situation, as shown by recent events, under the influence of various external and internal factors becomes unstable and filled with all sorts of unpredictable and, most importantly, difficult for most people, causing difficulties not only economic, but also psychological. Ukrainian citizens have some experience of uncontrolled collision for political, economic and social changes.

The article analyzes current scientific approaches and psychological theories that constitute the theoretical and methodological basis of research infantile personality. Isolation and analysis of individual methodologies of psychology is the most productive approach, a paradigm that defines the main lines of research infantile personality, because the term «infantilism», introduced to determine the behavior of adults which mimic childishness, was a sense of change. Modern psychological knowledge requires the creation of new theoretical and empirical approaches to the study of personality in all of its forms and contexts. The problem of passivity refers to the most complex category of knowledge, which, being widespread in domestic use, virtually was no confirmed by serious theoretical and empirical research in any field of psychology. Theoretical and methodological basis of research infantile personality are: genetic-modeling approach by S. D. Maksymenko main principles of integrative psychology, scientific understanding of the life of the individual, the general principles of the theory of personality.

Author Biography

Ю. В. Форманюк, South Ukrainian National Pedagogical University K. D. Ushinsky

Formanyuk Y.

References

Abulhanova-Slavskaya K. A. Vremia litchnosti i vremia zchizni [Time of personality and time of life]. — SPb.: Aleteja, 2001. — 304 s.

Ananiev B. G. O problemah sovremennogo chelovekoznaniya [About the problems of modern manknowledge]. — M.: Nauka, 1977. — 379 s.

Kozlov V. V. Socialnya rabota s krizisnoy litchnostiyu [Social work with crisis personality]. — Yaroslavl, 1999. — 303 s.

Maksimenko S. D. Geneza isnuvannia osobistosti [Genesis of existence of personality]. — K., 2006. — 240 с.

Chepeleva N. V. Rozuminnia ta interpretaciya osobistisnogo dosvidu v konteksti psihologichnoi germenevtiki [Understanding and interpretation of personality experience is in the context of psychological hermeneutics]. — 2003. — Vyp. 23. — S. 15-24.

Published

2015-09-26

Issue

Section

Статті