STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF PERSONAL CONSTRUCTS OF TEACHER’SELF-PRESENTATION

Authors

  • А. О. Кононенко Odesa I. I. Mechnikov National University, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18524/2304-1609.2014.1%20(31).135030

Keywords:

self-presentation, structural-functional model of personal constructs

Abstract

The complexity and ambiguity of substantial self-presentation phenomenon in modern science is revealed in a variety of approaches to the determination of the investigated psychic phenomena. Self-presentation is considered as a general feature of the social behavior of the individual. One of the main individual-personality constructs that make up the differential model of teacher’s self-presentation of humanities disciplines are personal construct. The purpose of the article is to highlight the structural analysis algorithm of personal construct teacher’s self-presentation. Each of the selected constructs, performing a function in a general model of self-presentation may be basic or coordination — basic construct emphasizes the universality of symptoms that go into it, and coordination reveals the degree of symptom dive into the process of subject-subject relations (we call it multysubjective construct). Personal construct is universal and includes symptoms character types and characteristics of self-esteem and motivation. Structural analysis of the construct was carried out as follows: evaluated descriptive statistics for the parameters of each structural component; calculated the correlation between the parameters component constructs; calculated relationship between the components studied by means of factor analysis. A personal construct model of teacher’s self-presentation of the humanities disciplines includes the following structural units: characterological features, especially the self-esteem and motivation of features, which are characterized by the influence individual and individual — multysubujective constructs. Using structural analysis revealed that the personal construct model of teacher’s self-presentation of humanities disciplines is very versatile, but can be described by a limited number of generalized characteristics.

Author Biography

А. О. Кононенко, Odesa I. I. Mechnikov National University

Kononenko A. A.

References

Baklyts’ka O. P., Stepanchenko N. I. Metodolohiya doslidzhennya diyal’nosti vykladacha VNZ fizkul’turnoho profilyu// O. P. Baklyts’ka, N. I. Stepanchenko/ Osvita rehionu. — 2012. — #1. — S. 305–313.

Bekh V. P., Shalimova Ye. O. «Funktsional’na model’ osobystosti: poshuky politykokul’turnykh determinant povedinky: Monohrafiya» / V. P. Bekh, Ye. O. Shalimova. — K. : Vyd-vo NPU imeni M. P. Drahomanova, 2009. — 255 s.

Bulatova O. S. Pedahohycheskyy artystyzm: [ucheb. posobye dlya stud. vыssh. ped. ucheb. zavedenyy] / Oksana Serheevna Bulatova. — M.: Akademyya, 2001. — 240 s.

Vashchenko A. M Profesiyni osoblyvosti spryynyattya u vykladachiv vyshchoyi shkoly Dukhovnist’ osobystosti: metodolohiya, teoriya i praktyka 3 (38) — 2010 S.36–45.

Vovkovins’kyy M. Pedahohichna tekhnika vykladacha profesiyno-tekhnichnoho navchal’noho zakladu. / M. Vovkovins’kyy // Naukovyy visnyk Instytutu profesiyno-tekhnichnoyi osvity NAPN Ukrayiny. Profesiyna pedahohika. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats’, 2013., Vyp. 5. — S. 79–85.

Hul’bs O. A. Osobystisne stanovlennya vykladacha vyshchoyi shkolyv profesiyniy diyal’nosti // Pravo i bezpeka Naukovyy zhurnal # 5 (32) 2009 Rezhym dostupu: http://archive.nbuv.gov.ua/portal/soc_gum/pib/2009_5/pb-5/pb-5_47.pdf

Zamfyr K. Udovletvorennost’ trudom. Mnenye sotsyoloha.// K.Zamfyr/ M., Polytyzdat, 1983. — 142 s.

Koshchynets’ O. Yu. Sotsial’no-psykholohichni osoblyvosti upravlins’koyi diyal’nosti kerivnyka zakladu osvity: avtoref. dys. kand. psykhol. nauk: 19.00.05. / O. Yu. Koshchynets’ — In-t psykholohiyi im. H. S. Kostyuka APN Ukrayiny. — K., 2001.- 18 s.

Nikolayev L. O. Orhanizatsiyno-metodychni zasady psykhodiahnostyky asertyvnosti pidlitkiv //L. O. Nikolayev/ Problemy zahal’noyi ta pedahohichnoyi psykholohiyi. — 2010 — t. XIV, ch. 3 s. 238–245.

Slastёnyn V. A., Podыmova L. S. Pedahohyka: Ynnovatsyonnaya deyatel’nost’//V. A. Slastёnyn, L. S. Podыmova- M.: Mahystr, 1997.- 224 s

Stepanchenko N. I. Vzayemozv’yazok zadovolenosti profesiyno-pedahohichnoyu diyal’nistyu z motyvatsiyeyu vykladachiv vuziv fizkul’turno-sportyvnoho profilyu / N. I. Stepanchenko // Visnyk Chernihivs’koho natsional’noho pedahohichnoho universytetu. Seriya: Pedahohichni nauky. — Chernihiv, 2012. — Vyn. 99, t. I. — S. 433–435.

Shevchuk T. O. Kul’tura pochuttiv vykladacha yak vazhlyvyy faktor vykhovannya studentiv// T. O. Shevchuk/ Problemy suchasnoyi pedahohichnoyi osvity : Ser.: Pedahohika i psykholohiya. Vyp. 8 ; Ch. 2, 2005. — S.39–45.

Shlyakov, D. V.Sotsyal’no-professyonal’naya ydentyfykatsyya uchytelya: sotsyolohycheskyy analyz: Dys. kand.. nauk 22.00.06 Sotsyolohyya kul’turы, dukhovnoy zhyzny// D. V. Shlyakov — Rostov-na-Donu, 2008.- 172 s.

Published

2015-03-25

Issue

Section

Статті