REFLECTION OF MODAL NARRATIVE BY FUTURE PRACTICAL PSYCHOLOGISTS

Authors

  • Д. М. Туркова Kryvyi Rih national university, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18524/2304-1609.2015.2%20(36).134858

Keywords:

narrative paradigm in psychology, narrative, autonarrative, modal narratologie, future practical psychologists

Abstract

In the article give the specific of the use of narrative paradigm is examined in psychological researches. The sources of narrative approach take beginning in a psychological hermeneutics, that interpretation of the personal experience is the basis of by means of text.

Essence of concept of «narrative» is determined, that is understood as the realized structured model of subjective reality of personality, provided with sense and emotional attitude toward her. The constructed of narrative models give an opportunity to interpret the senses stopped up in her basis, here ignoring temporal scopes, because the events of the past get possibility to be analyses in a situation «here and now».

As one of successful and effective variants of work with narrative texts, the model of modal narratologie is examined by V. P. Rudnev. In our research we came from considering of expediency of capture skill of interpretation of narrative texts by future practical psychologists. For the study of quality features of ability to interpret a narrative text of client, we realized research that was devoted to the study of ability of students–psychologists to the reflection of narrative own authorship, id est autonarrative. In the article give the results of empiric research of features of reflection of autonarrative are given by future practical psychologists through modal narratologie by V. P. Rudnev.

Author Biography

Д. М. Туркова, Kryvyi Rih national university

Turkova D.M.

References

Afanas’jeva N. Je. Naratyvizacija zhyttjevogo dosvidu v procesi psyhologichnogo konsul’tuvannja / N. Je. Afanas’jeva // Problemy eksperymental’noi’ ta kryzovoi’ psyhologii’. Zbirnyk naukovyh prac’. — Vyp.14. — Chastyna III. — H.: NUCZU, 2013. — S. 28–34.

Zhebjeljeva P. V. Analiz suchasnyh psyhologichnyh pidhodiv do rozuminnja fenomenu «naratyv» / P. V. Zhebjeljeva // Visnyk Chernigivs’kogo nacional’nogo pedagogichnogo universytetu. Serija «Psyhologichni nauky». — 2014. — Vyp. 121. — S. 132–136.

Metodychni rekomendacii’ shhodo vyvchennja navchal’noi’ dyscypliny «Zagal’na psyhologija» (dlja studentiv I–II kursu special’nosti «Praktychna psyhologija» dennoi’ formy navchannja) / upor. M. S. Velykodna, Je. L. Gergel’. — Kryvyj Rig: KPI DVNZ «KNU», 2014. — 39 s.

Moroz R. A. Naratyvy v psyhologichnij teorii’ i praktyci / R. A. Moroz // Problemy suchasnoi’ psyhologii’: Zbirnyk naukovyh prac’ Kam’janec’ Podil’s’kogo nacional’nogo universytetu

imeni Ivana Ogijenka, Instytutu psyhologii’ im. G. S. Kostjuka APN Ukrai’ny / Za red. S. D. Maksymenka, L. A. Onufrijevoi’. — Vyp. 8. — Kam’janec’–Podil’s’kyj: Aksioma, 2010. — S. 719–727.

Rudnev V. P. Haraktery i rasstrojstva lichnosti. Patografija i metapsihologija / V. P. Rudnev. — M.: «Klass», 2002. — 272 s.

Uajt M. Karty narrativnoj praktiki: Vvedenie v narrativnuju terapіju / M. Uajt. — M.: Genezis, 2010. — 326 s.

Chepeljeva N. V. Rozuminnja ta interpretacija osobystisnogo dosvidu v konteksti psyhologichnoi’ germenevtyky / N. V. Chepeljeva // Aktual’ni problemy suchasnoi’ ukrai’ns’koi’ psyhologii’: nauk. zapysky In–tu psyhologii’ im. G. S. Kostjuka APN Ukrai’ny / za red. S. D. Maksymenka. — K.: Nora–Druk, 2003. — Vyp. 23. — S. 15–24.

Shylovs’ka O. M. Psyhologichni osoblyvosti porodzhennja naratyvu jak zasobu samorozvytku osobystosti: avtoref. dys. na zdobuttja nauk. stupenja kand. psyhologichnyh nauk: spec.19.00.01 «Zagal’na psyhologija, istorija psyhologii’» / O. M. Shylovs’ka. — K., 2003. — 22 s.

Published

2015-06-23